Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Blackface Minstrelsy--Castle Rackrent Cont.

The continuation of Castle Rackrent marches on…

In response to the question: What is the connection Egenolf is making between minstrelsy and “blackface” and Edgeworth’s use of an Irish “dialect” in her novel? Can you point to places in the novel where you see this kind of performance on the part of Thady Quirk?

Egenolf writes, “Edgeworth’s blackface performance as Thady attempts to reinscribe a system of benevolent patronage in Ireland.” This is basically saying that through her character of Thady, she tries to reintroduce a compassionate support of Ireland, through blackface. This is done through Thady’s personality of the “foolishly loyal servant.” Egenolf also says that Thady’s ‘personality’ was used to “sugarcoat” and ease, in a way, the ways of the native Irish and the “horrors they had committed” during the rebellion of 1798. Though I took a liking to Thady’s character right off the bat, Egenolf comments that the late trend is to view Thady as “less innocent than he first appears.” See, I viewed him that way after I read into the story a bit more. Egenolf seems to have a very strong opinion that Edgeworth was trying to “tone down” the reality of what happened in Ireland during this period, when in reality she knew exactly what was going on. She was trying to make a different situation out of it, using a fictional novel to differ from real life. This is where blackface minstrelsy comes into play: it’s basically the same concept that she was doing except this occurred in parts of America.

Black minstrelsy “toned down” slavery and racism in America by having white people tell the tales of the African Americans themselves. They used costume make-up for transforming into the American slave (black face make-up, overly exaggerated lips) and put on performances which showed them “making history their own story.” In my opinion, it’s almost exactly what Egenolf claims Edgeworth to be doing in her own Castle Rackrent. Egenolf writes, “In England’s oldest colony, Ireland, dialect and language were, of course, the markers of difference, and these become the means of Edgeworth’s performance in Castle Rackrent.” When she says the ‘markers of the difference,’ she means to point out that although black minstrelsy allows a performer to ‘play the part’ of many different ethnic roles without a change of makeup, the only main difference between distinguishing the characters was through dialect.

Thady describes the scene between Sir Kit and his Lady what seemed to me as nonchalant. I may be wrong, but in my eyes he definitely ‘toned down’ the whole situation between Sir Kit and locking his Lady up. He also mentions that they still held conversations and he still cared about her though she was locked away because of pure embarrassment. I don’t know about anyone else, but if that situation happened in real life I’m sure it would not go so perfectly. Maybe perfect isn’t the best word, maybe ‘smoothly’ would be better. It’s hard to imagine that that would have actually happened in history. Perhaps I took it the wrong way, but throughout the whole story I have to agree with Egenolf: Maria Edgeworth definitely uses blackface minstrelsy in Castle Rackrent.

4 comments:

  1. Lucky,

    I find it interesting that perspectives can really affect how we interpret the same piece of work. I have to totally disagree with you regarding the use of blackface minstrelsy as a method used to "'tone down'" slavery and racism in America by having white people tell the tales of the African Americans themselves. They used costume make-up for transforming into the American slave (black face make-up, overly exaggerated lips) and put on performances which showed them “'making history their own story'.”

    Blackface minstrelsy was a form of racism in which white people would dress up, darken their faces and act out "their" ideas of what black people were like. These performances often portrayed blacks as inferior, bumbling, and ignorant. This stereotyping only added to the effects of racism. I think the purpose of blackface minstrelsy was in part to "tone down" something, but I think it was to "tone down" the whites guilt over the treatment of blacks and to help control the fears of the whites with regard to black people and any potential "uprisings".

    Egenolf wrote, "because the usual “visual
    marker of skin colour difference” used to “legitimate domination in other colonized societies” is absent, in Ireland difference is marked primarily through “language.” In my opinion this statement lends itself to the belief that in doing "linguistic blackface" Edgeworth is actually stating her belief that the native Irish were inferior which justified their colonization.

    Not sure if my perspective is any more correct than yours, but again, it's interesting to see the differences in perspectives.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, that's exactly what I meant--perhaps tone down wasn't the best phrase. I meant for it to be more like what you said, "rewriting history" and not necessarily making it seem any less important and serious that is was in history, but making a mockery of it and, in that way, toning down the seriousness of what it actually was in history. If that makes sense. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm with Dreamer on this one, but I also think we're forgetting that blackface minstrelsy was not only used in America. Clearly the intentions it served could be something other than racism (although for this discussion we'll stick with that theme). I have to say I didn't see (or maybe understand) the connection between blackface and the part of the novel you quoted- "Thady describes the scene between Sir Kit and his Lady what seemed to me as nonchalant. I may be wrong, but in my eyes he definitely ‘toned down’ the whole situation between Sir Kit and locking his Lady up. He also mentions that they still held conversations and he still cared about her though she was locked away because of pure embarrassment. I don’t know about anyone else, but if that situation happened in real life I’m sure it would not go so perfectly. Maybe perfect isn’t the best word, maybe ‘smoothly’ would be better. It’s hard to imagine that that would have actually happened in history. Perhaps I took it the wrong way, but throughout the whole story I have to agree with Egenolf: Maria Edgeworth definitely uses blackface minstrelsy in Castle Rackrent." Sorry to borrow the whole paragraph, but I wasn't sure where to chop out sentences.

    Okay, back to the quote and connection on blackface. Reading Egenolf's critique of "Rackrent" I think Egenolf was trying to say that character situations were not toned down, but rather the voices of such characters were extreme, comical, even mean. The best example I can give of this is the Editor's need to throughly explain the "ethnic" words used by Thady. Another place this "linguistic blackface" can be found is on page 78 when Thady is walking with Sir Murtagh and Jessica (the same couple you reference). Thady essentially puts on a performance for the new Lady, poking fun at himself, which is really Edgeworths way of knocking down the native Irish. Does that make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi there! So i suffered some computer issues so I'm posting my thoughts a little late:

    Hi lucky!

    I was intrigued to see you pick apart the idea of blackface. I am definitely on the same page with you. The idea of portraying a foolish character to maybe cover up the truth of a sad situation is no new thing. Edgeworth definitely spoke through Thady to create a loveable oaf who the audience would take a liking to although the audience would necessarily like a real life version of him.
    I think it’s great how you related this to United States history. I think part of the history of the American black face was to make it more “tolerable” for white middle America to see an “African American” on T.V. It transformed the African American into a comical character. This makes it easy to see how such things as black faces would perpetuate a negative stereotype of a race.
    So all in all it seems understandable that Edgeworth would use this type of “character” to speak through in her writing.

    ReplyDelete