
I hope everyone had a great spring break...didn't seem long enough! Anyways, I thought this reading this week was funny, I enjoyed the whole "moocow" phrase, as that's what my younger brother used to call cattle. It was an interesting read nonetheless and I enjoyed it.
What I think is most interesting in this novel is that there are the existing themes of religion, the role of an artist, and individuality, but there is also a theme of the human finding themselves throughout the turmoil of life despite the consequences of their actions, expectations of others, and obstacles they face. This is seen throughout this entire novel; the reader sort of goes on a timeline adventure of Stephen Dedalus's life, and more so James Joyce's life, since this IS a semi-autobiographical novel. I found through some research that this story was based off of a novel called Stephen Hero, but completely rewritten. Joyce was writing that novel when he became frustrated at what his wife, Nora had said it would never be published. I like how this novel is based off of Joyce's life, because I like when authors are brave enough to write about their life--from their success and failures to their dreams and most intimate of thoughts...basically I like autobiographies that are somewhat stories as well.
I found that this novel was highly relatable, even for someone living in the 21st century. The scene where Stephen goes for a walk on the beach and sees the beautiful young girl which triggers an epiphany is very relatable. The beginning of the epiphany starts with this passage..
“A girl stood before him in midstream, alone and still, gazing out to sea. She seemed like one whom magic had changed into the likeness of a strange and beautiful seabird. Her long slender bare legs were delicate as a crane's and pure save where an emerald trail of seaweed had fashioned itself as a sign upon the flesh. Her thighs, fuller and soft-hued as ivory, were bared almost to the hips, where the white fringes of her drawers were like feathering of soft white down. Her slate-blue skirts were kilted boldly about her waist and dovetailed behind her. Her bosom was as a bird's, soft and slight, slight and soft as the breast of some dark-plumaged dove. But her long fair hair was girlish: and girlish, and touched with the wonder of mortal beauty, her face.”
He uses such delicate language when describing her, which hints what is coming to the reader. He continues with:
“She was alone and still, gazing out to sea; and when she felt his presence and the worship of his eyes her eyes turned to him in quiet sufferance of his gaze, without shame or wantonness. Long, long she suffered his gaze and then quietly withdrew her eyes from his and bent them towards the stream, gently stirring the water with her foot hither and thither. The first faint noise of gently moving water broke the silence, low and faint and whispering, faint as the bells of sleep; hither and thither, hither and thither; and a faint flame trembled on her cheek.
-- Heavenly God! cried Stephen's soul, in an outburst of profane joy.”
This one line is the climax of the entire story. Joyce does an excellent job with imagery too—I can picture the whole thing in my head. It’s such a powerful passage, it makes the reader happy for him and gives a wave of relief (at least for me) that he realizes this. I became so attatched to the character of Stephen I guess simply because I could relate to the hardship of coming into one’s own and finding themselves. Continuing with the epiphany:
“He turned away from her suddenly and set off across the strand. His cheeks were aflame; his body was aglow; his limbs were trembling. On and on and on and on he strode, far out over the sands, singing wildly to the sea, crying to greet the advent of the life that had cried to him… To live, to err, to fall, to triumph, to recreate life out of life! A wild angel had appeared to him, the angel of mortal youth and beauty, an envoy from the fair courts of life, to throw open before him in an instant of ecstasy the gates of all the ways of error and glory. On and on and on and on!”
He realizes that love is natural to want, and that beauty shouldn't be a shame to desire, like how the church reinforces. He feels as though there should be no boundaries and doesn't want to conform or abide to any religion or other set of rules. That is why he chooses to live his life as the most liberating thing he can be--an artist. I personally can relate to a society where there are certain expectations you as a young adult have to live up to in order to be formally 'accepted' by society. Even if people don't admit or act that way, it's still in the subconscious. To further explain what I mean, look at homosexuality in today's world. Although it is becoming more widely accepted, most people still find it 'wrong' or they don't accept it, due to their religion or even just their personal beliefs. This can parallel to Portrait of the Artist in a way that is different but works. I have more things to say about this piece, but I’ll save it for next week. :)
Also, now I know who that picture is of on our teacher's homepage!
Thank you so much on your post! I think I became so engrossed with the obvious emo themes of teen angst and individuality within a conformist religion that I completely overlooked this party of the story. You recap of scene is poetic, soft, and romantic. I'm thinking Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan should play the roles. ;P
ReplyDeleteI will say I don't see your leap to homosexuality and acceptance in society. Could you explain that again?
You say "there is also a theme of the human finding themselves throughout the turmoil of life despite the consequences of their actions, expectations of others, and obstacles they face." I read that as this is a story of someone finding themselves against all odds and I wonder if he only found himself because of those situations? I think it's possible that his life journey would have been completely different if any of those factors had changed or didn't exist; much like the theory of butterfly effect. I think life is all about self-dicsovery, but that your journey and final conclusions are all tied into expectations and experiences.
Lucky,
ReplyDeleteSo I still haven’t finished this darn book and I’m dying to get to the end of it to see what happens…having a new puppy at home is definitely a time consuming situation so I’m trying to read during her “naps”…ridiculous, I know!!
Anyway, I’m so glad you wrote about the beach scene and provided your take on the situation. I find myself constantly confused about Stephen’s feelings; maybe I’m just not understanding the writing style yet. In the scene just prior to him seeing the girl in the water he is talking about the hearing and seeing the “boys” near or in the water. I think these must be classmates, but what I’m confused about is the following quote,
“The mere sight of that medley of wet nakedness chilled him to the bone. Their bodies corpsewhite or suffused with a pallid golden light or rawly tanned by the sun, gleamed with the wet of the sea” (Joyce 182).
So either I’m naïve or I’m reading too much into the wording; but I can’t tell if Stephan was aroused or disgusted by this scene. I continue to struggle with his reactions and responses to sexuality in this book. Perhaps I haven’t read far enough in the book yet, but sometimes I think he is lusting after women and sometimes after men; so maybe it’s both.
Anyway, your comment about the girl on the beach and Stephan’s epiphany was very helpful to reassure me that I was on the right track. It had seemed to me that he was finally happy for the first time and that he was realizing that it was ok to see something as beautiful. He was “pushing back” against the Catholic teachings and fear tactics. At least that’s what I thought, but again, I’ve been pretty confused lately.
Hey Lucky,
ReplyDeleteMan those are some bright colors!
I was glad to see that you chose the beach scene to analyze. To me it was one of the most important in the novel. The scene, which depicts Stephen going to the beach and seeing a beautiful girl and triggering an epiphany, is not only relatable but also an extremely important moment in Stephens’s life. In my opinion this scene marks the moment in Stephen’s life when he turns his back on the church and his family and turns toward the world. This moment where he chooses art over religion is obvious by Stephen’s reaction to the girl in the sea, which comes right after the scene where you see for the first time Stephen’s change of heart toward the Virgin Mary, whom he used to be blindly devoted to. “He crossed the bridge over the stream of the Tolka and turned his eyes coldly for an instant towards the faded blue shrine of the Blessed Virgin…” (175) This moment in which he turns away from the Virgin Mary and to the girl in the sea makes Stephen’s change from a life of religion and devotion to a life of art and beauty.
This scene also is a prime example of the way in which Stephen viewed women in the novel. Stephen always viewed women as superior beings who guided him in his decisions in life. The most notable female influence in Stephen’s life in the novel being the Virgin Mary, but when he turns away from religion and subsequently the Virgin Mary, you see the shift from his devotion to her to his devotion to the girl in the sea. “The worship of his eyes…Heavenly God! cried Stephen's soul, in an outburst of profane joy.” You see not only in the way in which he looks as the girl, but also in the poetic way in which he describes her that he sees her as more a piece of art than an actual human being. I believe that it is this way of thinking that stops him from actually approaching the girl, seeing her as something unattainable and superior.
I always wondered whom the picture was of on the class page too and was so glad when I figured it out! It really bothered me. Nice to see I was not the only one wondering about it☺
Beautiful picture, by the way! That's exactly how I imagine that scene!
ReplyDeleteI think CD brought up a good point about Stephen's portrayal of sexuality. There are times when Stephen seems aroused and disgusted by others in the novel, and I think this relates to the way in which sexuality is constructed in Stephen's world as just "evil" (even though he comes from a huge family...hmmmmm...where DID all those babies come from?). I believe a lot of this sexual confusion comes in the beginning of the novel with the boys teasing him about kissing his mother:
--O, I say, here's a fellow says he kisses his mother every night before he goes to bed.
The other fellows stopped their game and turned round, laughing. Stephen blushed under their eyes and said:
--I do not.
Wells said:
--O, I say, here's a fellow says he doesn't kiss his mother before he goes to bed.
They all laughed again. Stephen tried to laugh with them. He felt his whole body hot and confused in a moment. What was the right answer to the question? He had given two and stilll Wells laughed.
I think this is symbolic of Stephen's struggle with sexuality in the book. No matter what one does in this culture, it's deemed as "bad" or "sinful." Either you kiss your mother, or you don't, either way, you're going to be penalized for it. As Stephen grows up, he struggles to express desire and love for women and only does it clandestinely, which further compounds his sexual Catholic guilt.
I think seeing the bird woman was the first time he felt desire that was outside of the realm of this "good/bad" dichotomy.